CRIMM

v.

MISSISSIPPI

Citator

Cited By

• Patterson v. United States, 359 U.S. 495 (U.S. 1959)
  …for the Second Circuit affirmed dismissal of the libels on the ground that petitioners’ exclusive remedy was under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, [*496] 39 Stat. 742 et seq., 5 U. S. C. § 751 et seq., 258 F. 2d 702. We granted certiorari, 358 U. S. 898, to resolve a conflict between the decision below and that of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Inland Waterways Corp. v. Doyle, 204 F. 2d 874. In Johansen v. United States, 343 U. S. 427, 441, the Coúrt held “that the Federal Employee…
• Metallurgical Indus. Inc. v. Fourtek, Inc., 790 F.2d 1195 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …secrecy. The only question is whether we are dealing with a limited disclosure here. Prior caselaw provides no guidance on what constitutes limited disclosure. Metallurgical cites Hyde Cory. v. Huffines, 158 Tex. 566, 314 S.W. 2d 763, cert. denied 358 U.S. 898, 79 S.Ct. 223, 3 L.Ed.2d 148 (1958), and Sikes v. McGraw Edison Co., 665 F. 2d 731 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 458 U.S. 1108, 102 S.Ct. 3488, 73 L.Ed.2d 1369 (1982), in contending that subsequent disclosure of a trade secret does not free one from the…
• Taco Cabana Int'l, Inc. v. TWO Pesos, Inc., 932 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …ion used in one’s business, and which gives an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 158 Tex. 566, 586, 314 S.W. 2d 763, 776 (adopting Restatement of Torts § 757 (1939)), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 898, 79 S.Ct. 223, 3 L.Ed.2d 148 (1958). Architectural plans and kitchen layout and design drawings may be trade secrets.13 See, e.g., American Precision Vibrator Co. v. National Air Vibrator Co., 764 S.W. 2d 274, 278 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988…