SOPER
v.
MICHIGAN
SOPER
MICHIGAN
358 U.S. 903
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256 (2d Cir. 1959)…here to the position which we took in United States v. Spangelet, supra; United States v. Palermo, 2 Cir., 258 F. 2d 397, certiorari granted 358 U.S. 905, 79 S.Ct. 236, 3 L.Ed.2d 227; and United States v. Lev, 2 Cir., 258 F. 2d 9, certiorari granted 358 U.S. 903, 79 S.Ct. 231, 3 L.Ed.2d 226. We hold that the enactment of § 3500 was a valid exercise of Congressional power. It is also urged that the trial judge unduly limited the cross-examination of certain witnesses. The claimed errors relating to the cros…
-
In re Angus M. MacNEIL. Petition of Anthony Julian, 266 F.2d 167 (1st Cir. 1959)….Ed.2d 67; No. 5340, Boston Development Corp. v. State Realty Co. of Boston, Inc., order dismissing appeal entered March 25, 1958; No. 5381, M. A. Owens Co. v. Gargill, Trustee, order dismissing appeal entered July 31, 1958, certiorari denied 1958, 358 U.S. 903, 79 S.Ct. 237, 3 L.Ed.2d 230; No. 5410, Martin-Edward, Inc. v. United States, order dismissing appeal entered October 21, 1958; No. 5413 Original, In re MacNeil Bros. Co., 1958, 259 F. 2d 386; No. 5440, MacNeil Bros. Co. v. Slate Realty Co. of Bosto…