INGRAM ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Palermo v. United States, 360 U.S. 343 (U.S. 1959)
  …requested memorandum since it was not within the definition of “statement” in (e) of the Act.1 The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. 258 F. 2d 397. Together with several other cases raising Jencks Act problems, we granted certiorari, 358 U. S. 905, to determine the scope and meaning of this new statute. Accurate analysis of these problems as a basis of their appropriate solution requires due appreciation of the background against which the statutory terms must be projected. Exercising our p…
• Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672 (U.S. 1959)
  …etitioners and six others were convicted.1 Their convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 259 F. 2d 886. Certiorari was granted to examine the scope of the conspiracy statute in the context of these provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. 358 U. S. 905. At the trial it was established by overwhelming evidence that the petitioners had engaged with numerous others in a closely organized and large-scale operation of the numbers game in Atlanta, Georgia, during the years [*674] 1954 to 1957, the peri…
• United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …encks rule it is unconstitutional. As to this, unless and until the Supreme Court rules otherwise we shall adhere to the position which we took in United States v. Spangelet, supra; United States v. Palermo, 2 Cir., 258 F. 2d 397, certiorari granted 358 U.S. 905, 79 S.Ct. 236, 3 L.Ed.2d 227; and United States v. Lev, 2 Cir., 258 F. 2d 9, certiorari granted 358 U.S. 903, 79 S.Ct. 231, 3 L.Ed.2d 226. We hold that the enactment of § 3500 was a valid exercise of Congressional power. It is also urged that the t…