WISCONSIN ET AL.

v.

ILLINOIS ET AL.; MICHIGAN V. ILLINOIS ET AL.; AND NEW YORK V. ILLINOIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Clancy, 276 F.2d 617 (7th Cir. 1960)
  …v. United States, 10 Cir., 1959, 269 F. 2d 72; Borges v. United States, 1959, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 139, 270 F. 2d 332; Papworth v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 256 F. 2d 125, certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 854, 79 S.Ct. 85, 3 L.Ed.2d 88, rehearing denied, 358 U.S. 914, 79 S.Ct. 239, 3 L.Ed. 235. Next, defendants complain that the trial court .committed reversible error in refusing to direct an acquittal, or in the alternative to grant a new trial. In support of this allegation, defendants argue that the Governme…
• United States v. Consol. Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., 455 F.2d 432 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …ity an opportunity to formulate policy and rules before the courts are required to act. See Hills v. Eisenhart, 156 F.Supp. 902 (N.D.Cal. 1957) , aff’d, 256 F. 2d 609 (9th Cir. 1958) , cert. den., 358 U.S. 832, 79 S.Ct. 53, 3 L.Ed.2d 70, reh’g den., 358 U.S. 914, 79 S.Ct. 228, 3 L.Ed.2d 235. . This statement must be qualified with the exceptions set forth in § 10(c) itself, discussed infra. . “The last clause of section 10(c) relates to two situations. First, pursuant to section 8(a), an agency may permit…
• United States v. Coppola, 281 F.2d 340 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …999, 73 S.Ct. 1142, 97 L.Ed. 1405, rehearing denied, 1953, 346 U.S. 843, 74 S.Ct. 17, 98 L.Ed. 363; see Papworth v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 256 F. 2d 125, certiorari denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 854, 79 S.Ct. 85, 3 L.Ed.2d 88, rehearing denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 914, 79 S.Ct. 239, 3 L.Ed. 2d 235. However, a denial of a writ of certiorari imports no expression of opinion upon the merits of the decision wherein it is sought. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Ry. Co. v. Gibson, 1957, 355 U.S. 897, 78 S.Ct. 270, 2 L.Ed.2d 1…