BARR

v.

MATTEO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1959)
  …ue, and that either conclusion would defeat the qualified privilege. Accordingly it remanded the case to the District Court for retrial. 103 U. S. App. D. C. 176, 256 F. 2d 890. At this point petitioner again sought, and we again granted certiorari, 358 U. S. 917, to determine whether in the circumstances of this case petitioner’s claim of absolute privilege should have stood as a bar to maintenance of the suit despite the allegations of malice made in the complaint. The law of privilege as a defense by off…
• Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States, 360 U.S. 395 (U.S. 1959)
  …dure1 committed the inspection or not of grand jury minutes to the sound discretion of the trial judge, [*397] and that in this instance, no abuse of that discretion had been shown. We granted certiorari limited to the question posed by this ruling; 358 U. S. 917, 918. We conclude that in the circumstances of this case the trial court did not err in refusing to make. Jonas’ grand jury testimony available to petitioners for use in cross-examination. The indictment returned in the case named as defendants se…
• Scales v. United States, 367 U.S. 203 (U.S. 1961)
  …[*205] Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the Court. Our writ issued in this case (358 U. S. 917) to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals (260 F. 2d 21) affirming petitioner’s conviction under the so-called membership clause of the Smith Act. 18 U. S. C. § 2385. The Act, among other things, makes a felony the acquisition or holding of know…

  ← 1 / 2 →