BERNSTEIN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Taylor v. Burlington N. R.R. Co., 787 F.2d 1309 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …courts. See Quinn v. DiGiulian, 739 F. 2d 637, 644 (D.C.Cir.1984); Bernstein v. United States, 256 F. 2d 697, 706 (10th Cir.1958) (doctrine is no longer applicable after adoption of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), cert. dismissed per stipulation, 358 U.S. 924 (1959); 4 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1044, at 152 (1969). A plaintiff may prosecute actions on the same set of facts against the same defendant in different courts, even though the remedies the plaintiff seeks may be i…
• W. Union Tel. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 368 U.S. 71 (U.S. 1961)
  …fice in New York. Answering, New Jersey pointed out that under New York’s then controlling law3 it disclaimed any purpose to escheat property claimed for escheat by any other State. In this state of the New York law, we refused to take jurisdiction. 358 U. S. 924. By an act effective March 29, 1960,4 New York amended its law eliminating [*79] the disclaimer and now strongly asserts its claim to these funds under its new law. The rapidly multiplying state escheat laws, originally applying only to land and ot…
• Sperandeo v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Emps. Local Union NO. 537, 334 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1964)
  …., 326 F. 2d 561; Mitchell v. Roma, supra. . United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, 73 S.Ct. 528, 97 L.Ed. 727, 32 A.L.R.2d 382; Totten v. United States, 92 U.S. 105, 23 L.Ed 605; Bernstein v. United States, 10 Cir., 256 F. 2d 697, cert. dismissed, 358 U.S. 924, 79 S.Ct. 296, 3 L.Ed.2d 298; and Annotations, 95 L.Ed. 425; 97 L.Ed. 735; 32 A.L.R.2d 391. . Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451; Bernstein v. United States, supra. . Section 22 provides: “The head of each department is a…