MULLREED
v.
BANNAN, WARDEN; CARUSO V. MURPHY, WARDEN; WATKINS V. DOWD, WARDEN; SHANE V. RAGEN, WARDEN; RYAN V. TINSLEY, WARDEN; AND HAUGABROK V. RANDOLPH, WARDEN

U.S. | 1959-01-12
Nos. 346; No. 354; No. 376; No. 380; No. 400; No. 401
358 U.S. 925 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wolfe v. North Carolina, 364 U.S. 177 (U.S. 1960)
    …as applied in this case. Because of doubt as to whether any substantial federal question was presented to or decided by the state courts, we postponed further consideration of the question of jurisdiction until the hearing of the case on the merits. 358 U. S. 925, 359 U. S. 951. For reasons to be stated, we have concluded that the appeal must be dismissed.3 There is no dispute as to the basic circumstances which led to the prosecution and ultimate conviction of the appellants. In December, 1955, Gillespie P…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw