SMITH

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Atl. Ref. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of N.Y., 360 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1959)
  …ion to conduct such “a limited inquiry,!’ ibid., it vacated the order granting the certificates and remanded the case to the Commission. The importance in the administration of the Act of the questions thus posed required the granting of certiorari, 358 U. S. 926 (1959). We have concluded that the Court of Appeals was in error in deciding that the Commission had no jurisdiction. However, for reasons hereafter developed we hold that the order of the Commission in granting the certificates was in error and…
• Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147 (U.S. 1959)
  …ordinance were so construed it would be in conflict with the Constitution of the United States. This contention, together with other contentions based on the Constitution,4 was rejected, and the case comes here on appeal. 28. U. S. C. § 1257 (2); 358 U. S. 926. Almost 30 years ago, Chief Justice Hughes declared for this Court: “It is no longer open to doubt that the liberty of the . press, and of speech, is within the liberty safeguarded by the due process clause of the Fourteenth [*150] Amendment from i…
• United States v. Seaboard Air Line R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 78 (U.S. 1959)
  …6. The'District Court rendered judgment for respondent and the Court of Appeals affirmed by a divided vote. 258 F. 2d 262. We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari because of the seeming conflict between that ruling and our prior decisions. 358 U. S. 926. Respondent has a “classification or assembly yard” in Hopewell, Virginia. Trains to and from Hopewell use it for breaking.up incoming trains and for assembling cars into outgoing trains. A- track extends from this “classification” yard for about t…