ISOBELL HASKELL, WIDOW OF FRANK HASKELL, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
J. H. COOK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND DOING BUSINESS AS THE COOK LOGGING COMPANY, AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLEES
ISOBELL HASKELL, WIDOW OF FRANK HASKELL, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
J. H. COOK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND DOING BUSINESS AS THE COOK LOGGING COMPANY, AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLEES
184 So. 2d 454
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Confederation of Canada Life Insurance Co. v. Vega Y. Arminan, 144 So.2d 805 (Fla.1962).
RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL,- DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. L. T. Warehouse Co. v. Wilmott Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1974)…ict Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 294 So. 2d 712 (Fla.App.4, 1974), which purportedly conflicts with Duncan v. Pullum, 198 So. 2d 658 (Fla.App.2, 1967), and Leeward and Hart Aeronautical Corp. v. South Central Airlines, Inc., et al., 184 So. 2d 454 (Fla.App.1, 1966). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b) (3). Respondent, First National Bank of Winter Garden, filed suit against respondents, Wilmott Webb, Jack Brackney, and [*98] Webb Wood Products d/b/a Brackney Pallets, Inc…1 / 2
-
Mendez v. W. Flagler Fam. Ass'n, Inc., 303 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1974)…art of the issues between the parties.” (Emphasis supplied.) 268 So. 2d 177, 178-179. II. Petitioner urges conflict with Duncan v. Pullum, 198 So. 2d 658 (Fla.App.2d 1967), and with Leeward & Hart Aeronautical Corp. v. South Central Airlines, Inc., 184 So. 2d 454 (Fla.App. 1st 1966). In Duncan, supra, the order appealed was one which struck with prejudice defendant’s counterclaim. The argument was made that the appeal should be dismissed because the order was interlocutory. The Second District Court said “…1 / 2
-
Duncan v. Pullum, 198 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)…rtion of the order which struck appellant-defendant’s counterclaim with prejudice was final and appealable. [*661] Cf: Schwertfeger v. Constant, Fla.App. 1959, 109 S.2d 173; Leeward & Hart Aeronautical Corp. v. South Central Airlines, Fla.App. 1966, 184 So. 2d 454; and Hillsboro Plantation v. Plunkett, Fla.1951, 55 So. 2d 534. The general rule is that a judgment, order or decree to he appealable as final must dispose of all the issues or causes in the case; but the rule is relaxed where the judgment, order or…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Confederation OF Canada Life Ins. Co. v. Arminan, 144 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 1962)