UNITED STATES EX REL. THOMPSON

v.

LENNOX, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Spinelli v. United States, 382 F.2d 871 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …esses, and the government is not normally required to supply such information to the criminal defendant. The trial court’s denial of this request was well within its permissive powers. Bohn v. United States, 260 F. 2d 773 (8 Cir. 1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 931, 79 S.Ct. 320, 3 L.Ed.2d 304. Appellant contends that the indictment did not charge a crime within the spirit or intent of § 1952, as he was, at most, a single small-time gambler not engaged in an interstate business enterprise. Section 1952 makes…
• United States v. Crockett, 506 F.2d 759 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …s a violation of state law. We find no merit in this contention; a trial court is not required to define terms which are reasonably within the common understanding of a juror. Bohn v. United States, 260 F. 2d 773, 779 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 931, 79 S.Ct. 320, 3 L.Ed.2d 304 (1959) (court not required to define “a person engaged in the business of accepting wagers,” “placing bets on both sides of a transaction,” or “bookmaker”). We believe “commercial gambling,” as used in the Georgia statut…
• United States v. Crow, 523 F.2d 955 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …uest for further definition, it is not necessary. Cf. United States v. Robinson, 448 F. 2d 715 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 927, 92 S.Ct. 977, 30 L.Ed.2d 800 (1972); Bohn v. United States, 260 F. 2d 773, 779 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 931, 79 S.Ct. 320, 3 L.Ed.2d 304 (1959). In our view, there was sufficient evidence to find that the defendant entered a “dwelling house” and the verdict on Count III must be sustained. We feel the partial misstatement did not affect the substantial rig…