GLENN

v.

MISSOURI

Citator

Cited By

• SUN OIL Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 266 F.2d 222 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …e before the passage of the Act. We do not think the doctrine of Mobile applies in a situation such as is before us here. In United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, 358 U.S. 103, 79 S.Ct. 194, 3 L.Ed.2d 153, rehearing denied 358 U.S. 942, 79 S.Ct. 344, 3 L.Ed.2d 350, it was held that Section 4 procedures were available where rate increases were proposed pursuant to a “going rate” provision in the contract. The purpose of Congress was carried out in framing its regulatory scheme “not…
• Mich. Power Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 494 F.2d 1140 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …issued an order in Docket No. RP71-89 denying Michigan Power’s motion to reject on the ground that the Supreme Court in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div., 358 U.S. 103, 79 S.Ct. 194, 3 L.Ed.2d 153 (1958), rehearing denied, 358 U.S. 942, 79 S.Ct. 344, 3 L.Ed.2d 350 (1959), had sustained unilateral changes in contracts where the right to make such changes had not been bargained away by the natural gas pipeline company. The Commission deferred consideration of the applicability of se…
• Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Ferrer, 275 F.2d 497 (3d Cir. 1960)
  …rved his sentence of imprisonment in full prior to the determination of his appeal. St. Pierre v. United States, 1943, 319 U.S. 41, 63 S.Ct. 910, 87 L.Ed. 1199; Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 1958, 261 F. 2d 224, 16 Alaska 112, certiorari denied 358 U.S. 942, 79 S.Ct. 349, 3 L.Ed.2d 349; City of Seldovia v. Lund, D.C.AIaska 1956, 138 F.Supp. 382; Hill v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 1950, 75 A. 2d 138. It is true that if a defendant on appeal is able to show that his conviction entails collateral legal…