AHO
v.
JACOBSEN
AHO
JACOBSEN
359 U.S. 25
Supreme Court of the United States (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for retrial on the admiralty side, Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co., 358 U. S. 354, in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U. S. 625.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Miss. Valley Barge Line Co., 285 F.2d 381 (8th Cir. 1960)…v. United States Shipping Bd. E. F. Corp., 2 Cir., 48 F. 2d 113, 114. . Compare Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line, 323 U.S. 574, 580-581, 65 S.Ct. 421, 89 L.Ed. 465; Levinson v. Deupree, 345 U.S. 648, 652, 73 S.Ct. 914, 97 L.Ed. 1319; Aho v. Jacobsen, 359 U.S. 25, 79 S.Ct. 602, 3 L.Ed.2d 625; and Bowles v. Tanker (las, D.C.D.Minn., 5 E.R.D. 230, 233, 235. . 49 U.S.G.A. § 906(d). . Now 49 U.S.C.A. § 6(7).…
Authorities Cited
- Romero v. Int'l Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354 (U.S. 1959)
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625 (U.S. 1959)