HANDFORD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …to the jury that Ewing was a convicted criminal awaiting sentence. Upon objection, however, the judge again gave the jury an appropriate admonition. To support their attack on the conduct of the prosecutor, counsel cites Handford v. United States, 359 U.S. 120, 79 S.Ct. 722, 3 L.Ed.2d 673 in which the decision reported in 5 Cir., 260 F. 2d 890 was reversed in a brief Per Curiam, “[u]pon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General.” Counsel have made available to…
• Mack v. United States, 268 F.2d 931 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …f government attorneys in somewhat similar situations in Ginsberg v. United States, 5 Cir., 257 F. 2d 950; Nalls v. United States, 5 Cir., 240 F. 2d 707; and Handford v. United States, 5 Cir., 249 F. 2d 295, and see same case, 5 Cir., 260 F. 2d 890; 359 U.S. 120, 79 S.Ct. 722, 3 L.Ed.2d 673. Appellants argue that, without the improper testimony, the Government failed to make a case against them. We do not consider this point, as it was not mentioned among the Specifications of Error and no motions for verd…