BRISTOL ET AL.
v.
HEATON ET AL.
BRISTOL ET AL.
HEATON ET AL.
359 U.S. 230
Supreme Court of the United States (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the' appeal is dismissed.,. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miss. Univ. for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718 (U.S. 1982)…institution must necessarily inure to the benefit of some and to the detriment of others, depending upon the distance the affected individuals reside from the institution.” Heaton v. Bristol, 317 S. W. 2d 86, 99 (Tex. Civ. App. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U. S. 230 (1959), quoted in Williams v. McNair, 316 F. Supp., at 137. “Such a plan (i. e., giving the student a choice of a “single-sex” and coeducational institutions) exalts neither sex at the expense of the other, but to the contrary recognizes the equal…
-
Schattman v. Tex. Emp. Comm'n, 459 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1972)…8) 291 F.Supp. 122 (men subject, women not, under Selective Service Act); Clarke v. Redeker (D.C.Iowa 1966) 259 F.Supp. 117 (fixing wife’s residence by husband’s but not the reverse); Heaton v. Bristol (Tex.Civ.App.1958) 317 S.W. 2d 86, cert. denied 359 U.S. 230, 79 S.Ct. 802, 3 L.Ed.2d 765 and Allred v. Heaton (Tex.Civ.App.1960) 336 S.W. 2d 251, cert. denied 364 U.S. 517, 81 S.Ct. 293, 5 L.Ed.2d 265 (both involving denial of right of women to attend an all-male state-supported college). Conversely, sex-ba…