BURKE
v.
BENNETT, WARDEN

U.S. | 1959-04-20
No. 623
359 U.S. 311 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …cate.” See Braeburn Securities Corp. v. Smith, 15 Ill. 2d 55, 153 N. E. 2d 806, where a state statute forbade holding-company shareholders from acquiring stock of national banks. We dismissed the appeal “for want of a substantial federal question.” 359 U. S. 311. Accord: Trans-Nebraska Co., 49 Fed. Res. Bull. 633, 638 (1963). That decision was in line with federal policy of making state law the standard when it comes to certain kinds of branch banking. See United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.…
  • …he scope of the said powers and jurisdiction so reserved to the States by Congress, and said statute is constitutional (Braeburn Securities Corp. v. Smith, [15 Ill.2d 55,] 153 N.E. 2d 806, appeal dismissed for want of a substantial Federal question, 359 U.S. 311 [79 S.Ct. 876, 3 L.Ed.2d 831] (1959); Opinion of the Justices, [102 N.H. 106,] 151 A. 2d 236 (N.H.1959); also 12 U.S.C. § 1842(d), Federal Bank Holding Company Act)). “4. Act 275 of 1962 is directly applicable to intervening defendant, Whitney Nati…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw