FORE
v.
TOTH

U.S. | 1959-04-20
No. 740
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
359 U.S. 313 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is -granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the .papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • McMILLAN v. State of N.J., 408 F.2d 1375 (3d Cir. 1969)
    …ompliance with his duty “to instruct the jury as to the fundamental principles of law which control the case,” see State v. Butler, 27 N.J. 560, 595, 143 A. 2d 530, 550 (1958). See, also, State v. Riley, 28 N.J. 188, 145 A. 2d 601 (1958), cert. den. 359 U.S. 313, 79 S.Ct. 891, 3 L.Ed.2d 832, cert. den. 361 U.S. 879, 80 S.Ct. 166, 4 L.Ed.2d 117 (1959). Petitioner further asserts that the failure of his trial counsel to procure, by request or exception, such a charge was ineffective representation amounting…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw