MINNEY
v.
CITY OF AZUSA
MINNEY
CITY OF AZUSA
359 U.S. 436
Supreme Court of the United States (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question..
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Herbert Harvey, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 424 F.2d 770 (D.C. Cir. 1969)…ollege Hill, 114 Ohio App. 213, 175 N.E. 2d 203, 206, appeal dismissed, 172 Ohio St. 426, 178 N.E. 2d 36 (1961); Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah’s Witnesses v. Mullen, 214 Or. 281, 330 P. 2d 5, 12, 74 A.L.R.2d 347 (1958), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 359 U.S. 436, 79 S.Ct. 940, 3 L.Ed.2d 932 (1959); Wagoner v. City of Arlington, 345 S.W. 2d 759, 764 (Tex.Civ.App.1961); Petition of City of Bellevue, 62 Wash.2d 458, 383 P. 2d 286, 288 (1963). . Compare NLRB v. Harrah’s Club, supra note 93; NLRB v. Gene Compto…