SIEGEL ET AL.
v.
ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK

U.S. | 1959-06-01
No. 773
359 U.S. 552 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of -a substantial federal question.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Faudman, 640 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1981)
    …for falsifying or destroying records subpoenaed by a grand jury in its discussion of United States v. Cohen, 202 F.Supp. 587 (D.Conn.1962); United States v. Siegel, 152 F.Supp. 370 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff’d., 263 F. 2d 530 (2d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 552, 79 S.Ct. 1147, 3 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1960); and United States v. Solow, 138 F.Supp. 812 (S.D.N.Y.1956). The Essex court pointed out that in each of the cited cases the defendant was charged with something more than perjury—thus distinguishing them from…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw