CARPENTER

v.

LEDERLE, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. DISTRICT COURT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Parke, 362 U.S. 29 (U.S. 1960)
  …missed the complaint under Rule 41 (b) on the ground that upon the facts and the law the Government had not shown a right to relief. 164 F. Supp. 827. We noted probable jurisdiction of the Government’s direct appeal under § 2 of the Expediting Act.3 359 U. S. 903. Parke Davis makes some 600 pharmaceutical products which it markets nationally through drug wholesalers and [*32] drug retailers. The retailers buy these products from the drug wholesalers or make large quantity purchases directly from Parke Davis…
• Kinsella v. United States ex rel. Singleton, 361 U.S. 234 (U.S. 1960)
  …utional as applied to civilian dependents accompanying the armed forces overseas and charged with noncapital offenses, 164 F. Supp. 707, and the Government appealed. We noted probable jurisdiction and permitted appellee to proceed in jorma pauperis. 359 U. S. 903. The appellee is the mother of Mrs. Joanna S. Dial, the wife of a soldier who was assigned to a tank battalion of the United States Army. The Dials and their three children lived in government housing quarters at Baum-holder, Germany. In consequenc…