MCELROY, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES EX REL. GUAGLIARDO

Citator

Cited By

• Henry v. United States, 361 U.S. 98 (U.S. 1959)
  …to suppress the evidence was made by [*99] petitioner and overruled by the District Court; and the judgment of.conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals on a divided vote. 259 F. 2d 725. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari, 359 U. S. 904. There was. a theft from an interstate shipment, of whisky at a terminal in Chicago. The next day two FBI agents were in the neighborhood investigating it. They saw petitioner and one Pierotti walk across a street from a tavern and get into an auto…
• Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1960)
  …enth Circuit, following its decision in Blaski v. Hoffman, supra, granted the writ. 261 F. 2d 467. To settle the conflict that has arisen among the circuits respecting the proper interpretation and application of § 1404 (a),8 we granted certiorari. 359 U. S. 904; 361 U. S. 809. [*340] Without sacrifice or slight of any tenable position, the parties have in this Court commendably narrowed their contentions to the. scope of the only relevant inquiry. The points of contention may be sharpened by first observin…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Cont'l Grain Co. v. Fed. Barge Lines, Inc., 268 F.2d 240 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …situation, in all cases in which Section 1404 comes into play it presupposes at least two forums in which the defendant is amenable to process. See the full review of this in Blaski v. Hoffman, 7 Cir., 1958, 260 F. 2d 317, now pending on certiorari, 359 U.S. 904, 79 S.Ct. 583, 3 L.Ed.2d 570. But we have not so read the Act. To its literal terms we have, with others, recognized what seems to be to us the obvious implication that a cause may, on proper showing, be transferred to another district to which the…

  ← 1 / 2 →