UNITED STATES
v.
DURHAM LUMBER CO. ET AL.

U.S. | 1959-02-24
No. 579
359 U.S. 905 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp., 361 U.S. 459 (U.S. 1960)
    …ari. We granted the trustees’ petition, No. 18, and also the union’s petition, No. 19, except that we limited the latter grant to the question, whether the strikes and stoppages complained of by Benedict violated the collective bargaining agreement. 359 U. S. 905. In No. 19, the Court is equally divided. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, so far as it sustains the holding of the District Court that the union violated the collective bargaining.agreement, is therefore affirmed'. We turn to the question p…
  • United States v. Durham Lumber Co., 363 U.S. 522 (U.S. 1960)
    …North Carolina disagreed, and held that the respondents were entitled to payment of their claims before the Government could satisfy its tax lien. On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed, 257 F. 2d 570. We granted certiorari. 359 U. S. 905. In affirming the judgment of the District Court, the Court of Appeals stated that the nature and extent of the general contractors’ property rights, to which the tax lien attached, must be ascertained under state law. The court then undertook an e…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw