THOMAS ET AL.

v.

BROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH

Citator

Cited By

• Off. OF Supply v. NEW York Navigation Co., Inc., 469 F.2d 377 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …extinguish OSROK’s claim. See, e. g., M. V. M. Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 156 F.Supp. 879 (S.D. N.Y.1957), rev’d on other grounds, St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. United States Lines Co., 258 F. 2d 374 (2d Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 910, 79 S.Ct. 587, 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959). Such an expressed contractual time-bar must be distinguished from laches, which is essentially a principle of equity. Czaplicki v. Hoegh Silvercloud, 351 U.S. 525, 533, 76 S.Ct. 946, 100 L.Ed. 1387 (1956). Our d…
• Meredith v. THE Ionian Trader, 279 F.2d 471 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …ellant also relies upon our decision in St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. United States Lines Co., 2 Cir., 1958, 258 F. 2d 374, reversing M. V. M., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1957, 156 F.Supp. 879, certiorari denied, 1959, 359 U.S. 910, 79 S.Ct. 587, 3 L.Ed.2d 574. There suit was brought by the insured upon his contract of insurance, and the defendant insurance company, in accordance with Rule 14(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. [*475] C.A., impleaded the shipping lin…
• Noland Co. v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co., 301 F.2d 43 (4th Cir. 1962)
  …e case at bar— they are not. See Southern Milling Co. v. United States, 270 F. 2d 80 (5th Cir. 1959); Dery v. Wyer, 265 F. 2d 804 (2d Cir. 1959); St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. United States Lines Co., 258 F. 2d 374 (2d Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 910, 79 S.Ct. 587, 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959); Henry Fuel Co. v. Whitebread, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 236 F. 2d 742 (1956); American Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Greyhound Corp., 232 F. 2d 89 (5th Cir. 1956); and Blair v. Cleveland Twist Drill Co., 197 F. 2d 842 (7th Cir…