HARRIS

v.

ADAMS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …362 U.S. 937, 80 S.Ct. 759, 4 L.Ed.2d 751 (1960); Wagner v. United States, 264 F. 2d 524, 527 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 936, 79 S.Ct. 1459, 3 L.Ed.2d 1548 (1959); Hamer v. United States, 259 F. 2d 274, 278-79 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 916, 79 S.Ct. 592, 3 L.Ed.2d 577 (1959). See also United States v. Borelli, 336 F. 2d 376, 392 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 960, 85 S.Ct. 647, 13 L.Ed.2d 555 (1965). I must say, however, that learning of the county of the prospective juror…
• Baker v. United States, 401 F.2d 958 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …e Stone v. United States, 324 F. 2d 804 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 376 U.S. 938, 84 S.Ct. 793, 11 L.Ed.2d 659 (1963); Wagner v. United States, 264 F. 2d 524, 528 (9th Cir. 1959); Hamer v. United States, 259 F. 2d 274, 278-279 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 916, 79 S.Ct. 592, 3 L.Ed.2d 577 (1958); Hendrikson v. United States, 249 F. 34 (4tli Cir. 1918). . Appellant contends that, if the ten-day provision had been followed, he would have discovered that the man who became the foreman of the jury was a rese…
• United States v. Carmine Persico, 425 F.2d 1375 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …ety in government counsel’s consulting with law enforcement officials familiar with the area from which the jury was chosen during the jury selection process. See Hamer v. United States, 259 F. 2d 274, 278-281 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. de [*1386] nied, 359 U.S. 916, 79 S.Ct. 592, 3 L.Ed. 2d 577 (1959). The appellants were not prejudiced by the discreetly conducted investigation of a juror and the trial judge’s decision to excuse her on the ground that her husband had been convicted of an offense growing out o…