MACKEY, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION, ET AL.

v.

MENDOZA-MARTENIZ

Citator

Cited By

• Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1963)
  …ecause not based on any “rational nexus . . . between the content of a specific power in Congress and the action of Congress in carrying that power into execution.” On' direct appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1252, this Court noted probable jurisdiction, 359 U. S. 933, and then of its own motion remanded the cause, this time with permission to the parties to amend [*149] the pleadings to put in issue the question of whether the facts as determined on the draft-evasion conviction in 1947 collaterally estopped the…
• Minneapolis & ST. Louis Ry. Co. v. United States, 361 U.S. 173 (U.S. 1959)
  …ssion’s order. 165 F. Supp. 893. On separate appeals by the Minneapolis, the State of Minnesota and its regulatory commission, and the State of South Dakota and its regulatory commission, the case was brought here and we noted probable jurisdiction. 359 U. S. 933. All of those who were defendants and intervenors in opposition to the complaint in the District Court, except the Nickel Plate, are appellees in this Court. - Minneapolis, supported by the States of Minnesota and South Dakota, contends, first, tha…
• MacKey v. Mendoza-Martinez, 362 U.S. 384 (U.S. 1960)
  …istrict Court held that § 401 (j) was unconstitutional. The case is here on direct appeal (28 U. S. C. § 1252) from the judgment of the District Court holding that appellee is therefore a citizen of the United States. We noted probable jurisdiction. 359 U. S. 933. After the case was argued the Court, sua sponte, put to the parties the following questions based on appellee’s conviction for draft evasion: 2 “(1) Was the judgment of conviction of appellee for draft evasion premised in any respect upon his [*3…