HICKS

v.

SUMMERFIELD, POSTMASTER GENERAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Frazier v. United States, 419 F.2d 1161 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …L.Ed.2d 527 (1966); Muschette v. United States, 116 U.S. App.D.C. 239, 322 F. 2d 989 (1963), vacated on other grounds 378 U.S. 569, 84 S.Ct. 1927, 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964); Heideman v. United States, 104 U.S.App. D.C. 128, 259 F. 2d 943, cert. denied 359 U.S. 959, 79 S.Ct. 800, 3 L.Ed.2d 767 (1958). This case itself is illustrative of the difficulty: the police practice of processing at headquarters persons arrested at the precinct may or may not be essential to efficient police administration ; if it is ess…
• Ricks v. United States, 334 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
  …United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 62, 65, 250 F. 2d 30, 33 (1957). . Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 453, 77 S.Ct. 1356 (1957). . Compare, Heideman v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 128, 130-131, 259 F. 2d 943, 945-946 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 959, 79 S.Ct. 800, 3 L.Ed.2d 767 (1959). And see Tatum v. United States, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 188, 313 F. 2d 579 (1962). In Ginoza v. United States, 279 F. 2d 616 (9th Cir. 1960), the court, sitting ezz banc, ruled inadmissible a statement made after only…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …be understood as indicating any views as to the result there reached. Cf. Metoyer v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 62, 250 F. 2d 30 (D.C.Cir. 1957), and Heideman v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 128, 259 F. 2d 943 (D.C.Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U. S. 959, 79 S.Ct. 800, 3 L.Ed.2d 767 (1959). See Jones v. United States, 342 F. 2d 863, 865 (D.C.Cir. 1964) (en banc).…