RIOS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Rios v. United States, 364 U.S. 253 (U.S. 1960)
  …evidence “may nevertheless be received in a federal prosecution, if the seizure was made without the participation of federal officials.” 256 F. 2d 173, at 176. Certiorari was granted in an order which limited the questions for consideration to two, 359 U. S. 965: “1. Independently of the state court’s determination, was the evidence used against petitioner in the federal prosecution obtained in violation of his rights under the Constitution of the United States? “2. If the evidence was unlawfully obtained…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Drivers, 362 U.S. 274 (U.S. 1960)
  …inapplicable to peaceful picketing, whether 'organizational’ or ‘recogni-tional’ in nature . . . .” 107 U. S. App. D. C. 42, 43, 274 F. 2d 551, 552.4 Because of the importance of the question in the administration of the Act, we. granted certiorari. 359 U. S. 965. After we granted certiorari, the Congress enacted the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, which, among other things, adds a new § 8 (b)(7) to the National Labor Relations Act.5 It was stated [*278] by the Board on oral argument…
• Charles v. United States, 278 F.2d 386 (9th Cir. 1960)
  …ed. . The “silver platter” doctrine is currently under fire. Compare Hanna v. United States, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 205, 260 F. 2d 723 with United States v. Camara, 7 Cir., 1959, 271 F. 2d 787. A pertinent Supreme Court decision is forthcoming. See 359 U.S. 965, 79 S.Ct. 881, 3 L.Ed.2d 833, granting certiorari in Rios v. United States, 9 Cir., 1958, 256 F. 2d 173. . Modern police practice calls for a thorough search at the stationhouse of any person who is taken into custody as well as the “frisking” whic…