NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.

v.

BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Forman v. United States, 361 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1960)
  …irecting a new trial, violated the command of the Fifth Amendment that no person shall “be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” Petitioner’s motion for rehearing was denied. 264 F. 2d 955. We granted certiorari. 359 U. S. 982. We affirm the order directing a new trial. The facts are detailed in the original opinion of - the Court of Appeals, 259 F. 2d 128, and it is sufficient here merely to summarize them. In 1941 petitioner and Seijas, a lawyer, formed a partnership t…
• Local NO. 8-6, OIL, Chem. & Atomic Workers Int'l Union, AFL-CIO v. Missouri, 361 U.S. 363 (U.S. 1960)
  …nstitution, and that ifviolates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Because of doubt as to whether the controversy was moot, we postponed further consideration of the question of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits. 359 U. S. 982. The appellants áre labor unions which represent employees of the Laclede Gas Company, a corporation engaged .in the business of selling natural gas in the St. Louis area. In the spring of 1956 the appellants notified Laclede of their desire to neg…
• In re The Cent. R.R. Co. OF NEW Jersey, 485 F.2d 208 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …§ 205 (o). Compare Smith v. Hoboken R. Co., 328 U.S. 123, 66 S.Ct. 947, 90 L.Ed. 1123 (1946), with Board of Public Utility Com’rs of New Jersey v. United States, 158 F.Supp. 98 (D.N.J.1958), prob juris noted, 357 U.S. 917 (1958), dismissed as moot, 359 U.S. 982, 79 S.Ct. 939, 3 L.Ed.2d 932 (1958). 16a . For the purposes of the present appeal, this Court has assumed that the district court would have the power to permit termination of certain rail services if such termination had been approved by the appr…