ARNOLD

v.

BEN KANOWSKY, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc., 361 U.S. 388 (U.S. 1960)
  …ts.1 The suit was brought by petitioner individually under § 16 (b) of the Act for payment of overtime wages claimed under § 7. The Court' of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed a District Com t iudgment for petitioner2 and we granted certiorari, 359 U. S. 983. The proceedings in this Court are in forma pauperis, loth sides submitted on [*390] their briefs, and oral argument was heard only from the representative of the Secretary of Labor appearing as amicus curiae. Respondent conducts an interior decora…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware, Inc., 361 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1960)
  …eedings.” Id., at 510. It, therefore, dismissed the Board’s petition for adjudication in civil contempt. It also denied the Board’s motion for discovery, inspection, and depositions. 261 F. 2d 503, 510. The case is here on a petition for certiorari, 359 U. S. 983, which we granted in order to consider the [*402] validity of the action of the Court of Appeals in dismissing the petition insofar as it charged the existence of “a single enterprise.” The Court of Appeals dismissed the petition without considerin…
• Edwards v. Sears, 512 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …ection. See San Antonio v. Timko, 2 Cir., 1966, 368 F. 2d 983, 986; Klotz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 7 Cir., 1959, 267 F. 2d 53, 55, cert. denied, 361 U.S. 877, 80 S.Ct. 141, 4 L.Ed.2d 114; Theriot v. Mercer, 5 Cir., 1959, 262 F. 2d 754, cert. denied, 359 U.S. 983, 79 S.Ct. 941, 3 L.Ed.2d 933; F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Wilson, 5 Cir., 1934, 74 F. 2d 439, 442-443. See also New York Central R. Co. v. Johnson, 279 U.S. 310, 318-319, 49 S.Ct. 300, 303-304, 73 L.Ed. 706 (1929). We emphasize, however, our continued r…