JONES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Bates v. City OF Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (U.S. 1960)
  …embership lists under the circumstances was “not an unconstitutional invasion of the freedoms guaranteed . . .” but “a mere incident to a permissible legal result.”8 Because of the significant constitutional question involved, we granted certiorari. 359 U. S. 988. Like freedom of speech and a free press, the right of peaceable assembly was considered by the Framers of our Constitution to lie at the foundation of a government [*523] based upon the consent of an informed citizenry — a government dedicated to…
• United States v. Price, 361 U.S. 304 (U.S. 1960)
  …not .effective because a 90-day letter had not been issued, and that § 272 (a) therefore barred the action. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 263 F. 2d 382, and in view of contrary decisions in the First and Sixth Circuits,2 we granted cer- • tiorari. 359 U. S. 988. For reasons hereafter stated we think the court below was in error. We start with the language of § 272 '(d). By its terms, . the right of waiver is to be available “at any time,” and is applicable to “the restrictions” contained in § 272 (a). Thos…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Travelers Health Ass'n, 362 U.S. 293 (U.S. 1960)
  …of Nebraska.” It was his view that Nebraska’s regulation of deceptive practices “in any other state” is not “the kind of regulation by state law Congress had in mind” in enacting the McCarran-Ferguson Act. 262 F. 2d 241, 245. Certiorari was granted, 359 U. S. 988, to resolve an important question left undecided in Federal Trade Comm’n v. National Casualty Co., 357 U. S. 560. In that case the issue involved the effect of state laws regulating the advertising practices of insurance companies which were licens…