UNITED STATES

v.

MERCHANTS MATRIX CUT SYNDICATE, INC.

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Chatham Shipping Co. v. Fertex S.S. Corp., 352 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …7 F. 2d 249 (2 Cir. 1961). The Farr decision is not without logical support and is in line with the general current of authority. See 243 F. 2d at 345, n. 3, and Judge Maris’ opinion in Rogers v. Schering Corp., 262 F. 2d 180 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 991, 79 S.Ct. 1121, 3 L.Ed.2d 980 (1959). Moreover, the Supreme Court has- held that an order directing arbitration under § 301(a) of the TaftHartley Act is appealable as a final judgment, Goodall-Sanford, Inc. v. United Textile Workers, 353 U.S. 550,…
• Gavlik Constr. Co. v. H. F. Campbell Co., 526 F.2d 777 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …gaining agreement is, therefore, a “final decision” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 353 U.S. at 551-52, 77 S.Ct. at 921. We followed the Goodall-Sanford decision in Rogers v. Schering Corp., 262 F. 2d 180, 182 (3d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 991, 79 S.Ct. 1121, 3 L.Ed.2d 980 (1959), where we stated in a commercial arbitration context: It is settled that an order for arbitration is a final appealable decision where it is not merely a step in the judicial enforcement of a claim nor auxiliary…
• Hartford Fin. Sys., Inc. v. Fla. Software Servs., Inc., 712 F.2d 724 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …e, Inc. v. Leonard, 384 F. 2d at 308; Chatham Shipping Co. v. Fertex Steamship Corp., 352 F. 2d 291, 294 (2d Cir.1965) (Friendly, J.); Rogers v. Schering Corp., 262 F. 2d 180,182 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Hexagon Laboratories, Inc. v. Rogers, 359 U.S. 991, 79 S.Ct. 1121, 3 L.Ed.2d 980 (1959); Farr & Co. v. CIA. Intercontinental de Navegacion de Cuba, 243 F. 2d 342, 344-45 (2d Cir.1957); Continental Grain Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc., 118 F. 2d 967, 968 (9th Cir.1941); Krauss Brothers Lumber Co. v. Lou…