CURRY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Porter v. United States, 298 F.2d 461 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …le witness in civil proceedings, he could have been called. Nor is it important that Glass, if called, may not have testified to things establishing petitioner’s innocence. Cf. Weaver v. United States, 8 Cir., 1959, 263 F. 2d 577, 579, cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1014, 79 S.Ct. 1154, 3 L.Ed.2d 1038. What was involved was the more basic thing. The Constitution assures a defendant effective representation by counsel whether the attorney is one of his choosing or court-appointed. Such representation is lacking, how…
• United States v. Garland Jeffers, 520 F.2d 1256 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …x rel. Miller v. Myers, 253 F.Supp. 55 (E.D.Pa.1966); People v. Stoval, 40 Ill.2d 109, 239 N.E. 2d 441 (1968); cf. Randazzo v. United States, 339 F. 2d 79 (5th Cir. 1964). But see Weaver v. United States, 263 F. 2d 577 (8th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 1014, 79 S.Ct. 1154, 3 L.Ed.2d 1038; Hayman v. United States, 205 F. 2d 891 (9th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 959, 75 S.Ct. 889, 99 L.Ed. 1282. In Zurita v. United States, supra, n. 3, we ordered a remand for a hearing to determine exactly the nat…
• York v. Page, 433 F.2d 941 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …t be intentional. See Buchanan v. State, 25 Okl.Cr. 198, 219 P. 420, 423; Wilson v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 421, 209 P. 2d 512, 514, 212 P. 2d 144; Parker v. State, Okl.Cr., 273 P. 2d 778, 782; and Glenn v. State, Okl.Cr., 333 P. 2d 597, 601, cert. denied 359 U.S. 1014, 79 S.Ct. 1155, 3 L.Ed.2d 1039. The appellant argues that the omission of the word “intentionally,” in that portion of the instructions referring to the Oklahoma statute declaring it a misdemeanor to point a gun at an individual, is an unforeseeab…