LEV
v.
UNITED STATES
LEV
UNITED STATES
360 U.S. 470
Supreme Court of the United States (1959)
Caution
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 2d 1531 · 79 S. Ct. 1431 · 1959 U.S. LEXIS 755 · SCDB 1958-137
Cited by 19 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
-
Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184 (5th Cir. 1975)…gressional testimony is not provided. . Petitioner cites Harney v. United States, 1 Cir., 1962, 306 F. 2d 523, cert. denied, 371 U.S. 911, 83 S.Ct. 254, 9 L.Ed.2d 171; United States v. Lev, 2 Cir., 1958, 258 F. 2d 9, aff’d by equally divided court, 360 U.S. 470, 79 S.Ct. 1431, 3 L.Ed.2d 1531 (1959), and United States v. Tane, E.D.N.Y., 1962, 29 F.R.D. 131, for the proposition that the Jencks Act can require the production of testimony held by a congressional committee. In each case, however, the request fo…
-
United States v. Kenner, 354 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1965)…lars for each such audit. Far from being insufficient the evidence leaves no room for any other conclusion than that the payments were made for the pretended audits. See United States v. Lev, 258 F. 2d 9 (2d Cir.), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 360 U.S. 470, 79 S.Ct. 1431, 3 L.Ed.2d 1531, petition for rehearing denied, 361 U.S. 856, 80 S.Ct. 41, 4 L.Ed. 2d 95 (1959). [*785] Appellant contends that it was error for the judge to fail to charge that in order to convict under Section 201(f) corrupt intent…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence