COFIELD
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1959-06-22
No. 677
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent, believing that this case should not be disposed of without plenary consideration.
360 U.S. 472 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

In view of all the circumstances under which this defendant entered a plea of guilty and the plea was accepted, the petition is granted and the sentence is vacated and the cause remanded with instructions to allow petitioner to withdraw his plea of guilty and plead anew.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent, believing that this case should not be disposed of without plenary consideration.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Garza v. Idaho, 139 S. Ct. 738 (U.S. 2019)
    …1965) ; Frand v. United States , 301 F.2d 102, 103 (CA10 1962) ; O'Malley v. United States , 285 F.2d 733, 734 (CA6 1961) ; Snead v. Smyth , 273 F.2d 838, 842 (CA4 1959) ; Cofield v. United States , 263 F.2d 686, 689 (CA9), vacated on other grounds, 360 U.S. 472, 79 S.Ct. 1430, 3 L.Ed.2d 1531 (1959) ; Johnston v. United States , 254 F.2d 239, 240 (CA8 1958) ; United States ex rel. Feeley v. Ragen , 166 F.2d 976, 980-981 (CA7 1948) ; United States v. Wight , 176 F.2d 376, 379 (CA2 1949). Beginning in 1970,…
  • Callahan v. Lake F. Russell, 423 F.2d 450 (6th Cir. 1970)
    …ntence prosecution. The Court held that counsel devoted sufficient time to insure an adequate defense and there was not a denial of effective assistance of counsel. In Cofield v. United States, 263 F. 2d 686 (9th Cir. 1959), rev'd on other grounds, 360 U.S. 472, 79 S.Ct. 1430, 3 L.Ed.2d 1531 [1959], the defendant pleaded guilty after one and one-half hours of consultation with an attorney. The Court held that the time was sufficient. “Thus, whatever the showing may be as to the time and facilities made av…
  • Garrett Brock Trapnell v. United States, 725 F.2d 149 (2d Cir. 1983)
    …4 (6th Cir.1961); United States ex rel. Feeley v. Ragen, 166 F. 2d 976, 980-81 (7th Cir.1948); Johnston v. United States, 254 F. 2d 239, 240 (8th Cir. 1958); Cofield v. United States, 263 F. 2d 686, 689 (9th Cir.), rev’d per curiam on other grounds, 360 U.S. 472, 79 S.Ct. 1430, 3 L.Ed.2d 1531 (1959); Frand v. United States, 301 F. 2d 102, 103 (10th Cir.1962). The two remaining circuits adopted the “farce and mockery” standard in 1965 and 1970, respectively. See Williams v. Beto, 354 F. 2d 698, 704 (5th Ci…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw