DEGREGORY
v.
WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
DEGREGORY
WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
360 U.S. 717
Supreme Court of the United States (1959)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DeGREGORY v. Attorney General of New Hampshire, 383 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1966)…n, supra, at 79. New Hampshire’s interest on this record is too remote and conjectural to override the guarantee of the First Amendment that a person can speak or not, as he chooses, free of all governmental compulsion. Reversed DeGregory v. Wyman, 360 U. S. 717; DeGregory v. Attorney General, 368 U. S. 19. After remand of the latter case appellant purged himself of contempt by answering in the negative the question “Are you presently a member of the Communist Party?” Subsequently, new hearings were held an…
-
Wansley v. Slayton, 487 F.2d 90 (4th Cir. 1973)…rs after pictures of the jurors accompanied by their names and addresses appeared in the press.” . See, United States v. Bowe, supra (360 F. 2d 1, at p. 11) : . Mikus v. United States (2d Cir. 1970) 433 F. 2d 719, 723, citing Irvin v. Dowd, supra (360 U.S. 717 at 723, 81 S.Ct. 1639). . Irvin v. Dowd, supra (360 U.S., at p. 723, 81 S.Ct. 1639). For an interesting discussion of this subject, see Stanga, Judicial Protection of the Criminal Defendant Against Adverse Press Coverage, 13 Wm. & Mary L.Bev. 1 (19…