LUCAS

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Vita, 294 F.2d 524 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …duty around the clock. Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 1959, 273 F. 2d 781, 798, certiorari denied 1960, 362 U.S. 951, 80 S.Ct. 862, 4 L.Ed.2d 868; Porter v. United States, 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 385, 258 F. 2d 685, 692, certiorari denied, 1959, 360 U.S. 906, 79 S.Ct. 1289, 3 L.Ed.2d 1257; see United States v. Bando, 2 Cir., 244 F. 2d 833, 846, certiorari denied 1957, 355 U.S. 844, 78 S.Ct. 67, 2 L.Ed.2d 53. Vita was arrested in Manhattan but was brought before the United States Commissioner for the Ea…
• Williams v. United States, 273 F.2d 781 (9th Cir. 1959)
  …rate, whether or not the ‘confession is the result of torture, physical or psychological * * *’ ” The same views were expressed by retired Justice Stanley Reed in Porter v. United States, 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 385, 258 F. 2d 685, certiorari denied 360 U.S. 906, 79 S.Ct. 1289, 3 L.Ed.2d 1257, wherein the following statement appears at page 688 of 258 F. 2d: “Illegal detention under the Federal Rules occurs when there is ‘unnecessary delay’ in the preliminary hearing preceding the statement. The statement…
• United States v. Nakaladski, 481 F.2d 289 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …luded a clear inference that Coco had been imprisoned, we find that Coco’s substantial rights were not affected by Goodman’s testimony. See Rule 52, F.R.Crim.P.; Porter v. United States, 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 385, 258 F. 2d 685, cert. denied, 1959, 360 U.S. 906, 79 S.Ct. 1289, 3 L.Ed.2d 1257. We do not in any way see how Nash’s substantial rights might have been violated. (2) Goodman also made two conclusory statements to the effect that appellants were partners with Falco in the shylocking business. Appe…