FROMEN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• United States v. Gross, 416 F.2d 1205 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …r in this manner and it was done that way.” It is established that check kiting is within the reach of the fraud statutes. Stevens v. United States, 227 F. 2d 5 (8 Cir. 1955); United States v. Fromen, 265 F. 2d 702, 704 (2 Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 909, 79 S.Ct. 1295, 3 L.Ed.2d 1260; Falconi v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 257 F. 2d 287, 291 (3 Cir. 1958); United States v. Lowe, 115 F. 2d 596 (7 Cir. 1940), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 717, 61 S.Ct. 441, 85 L.Ed. 466; Williams v. United States, 278 F. 2d…
• United States v. Leyva, 513 F.2d 774 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …330 U.S. 258, 296, 67 S.Ct. 677, 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947); United States v. DeSimone, 267 F. 2d 741, 743 (2d Cir.), vacated as moot, 361 U.S. 125, 80 S.Ct. 253, 4 L.Ed.2d 167 (1959); Bullock v. United States, 265 F. 2d 683, 691 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 909, 79 S.Ct. 1294, 3 L.Ed.2d 1260 (1959). Rather than being an innovation dispensing with the necessity of an indictment for criminal contempt, Rule 42(b) simply made more explicit the prevailing usages at law governing the procedure to be followed in…
• United States v. Vida, 370 F.2d 759 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …within the discretion of the District Judge. Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84, 95, 75 5. Ct. 158, 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954); Sharp v. United States, 195 F. 2d 997, 999 (CA 6, 1952); Bullock v. United States, 265 F. 2d 683, 689 (CA 6, 1959), cert. den. 360 U.S. 909, 79 S.Ct. 1294, 3 L.Ed. 1260. A district judge has the power to order a severance under Rule 14, F.R. Crim.P., and indeed has a “continuing duty at all stages of the trial to grant a severance if prejudice does appear.” Schaffer v. United States, 3…