BROWN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• MacKENNA v. Ellis, 280 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …ates, 5 Cir., 1960, 275 F. 2d 673; T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Williams, 5 Cir., 1960, 275 F. 2d 397; Empire Picture Co. et al. v. City of Fort Worth et al., 5 Cir., 1960, 273 F. 2d 529; Williams v. Moore, 5 Cir., 1959, 262 F. 2d 335, cer-tiorari denied 360 U.S. 911, 79 S.Ct. 1297, 3 L.Ed.2d 1261. . Bute v. Illinois, 1948, 333 U.S. 640, 68 S.Ct. 763, 772, 92 L.Ed. 986. . Cahn, Sense of Injustice. (New York U.Pr.1949). . Cardozo, Palko v. Connecticut, 1937, 302 U.S. 319, 58 S.Ct. 149, 152, 82 L.Ed. 288, at pa…
• United States v. Decoster, 624 F.2d 196 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …legations of counsel’s lack of ability or preparedness; inquiry must be on record and findings of fact must be sufficient to permit meaningful appellate review). In Brown v. United States, 105 U.S. App.D.C. 77, 264 F. 2d 363 (en banc), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 911, 79 S.Ct. 1299, 3 L.Ed.2d 1262 (1959), this court considered the scope of the trial judge’s obligation to inquire into the defendant’s objection to counsel. In his concurrence, Chief Justice (then Judge) Burger summarized the grounds of common agree…
• United States v. Seale, 461 F.2d 345 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …d pro se was strictly limited, exercisable only in the trial court’s sound discretion.25 We agree with then Circuit Judge Burger, concurring in Brown v. United States, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 77, 264 F. 2d 363, 368 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), certiorari denied, 360 U.S. 911, 79 S.Ct. 1299, 3 L.Ed.2d 1262 (1958), that “[t]he issue here is not whether an accused has a right to try his own case in proper person; nor is the issue whether an accused must in all circumstances be informed explicitly by the court that he had a…

  ← 1 / 3 →