CORCORAN

v.

FAY, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (U.S. 1960)
  …ifth Amendment in that it deprived appellee of an accrued property right. 169 F. Supp. 922. The Secretary prosecuted an appeal to this Court, and, subject to a jurisdictional question hereinafter discussed, we set the case down for plenary hearing. 360 U. S. 915. The preliminary jurisdictional question is whether 28 U. S. C. § 2282 is applicable, and therefore required that the case be heard below before three judges, rather than by a single judge, as it was. Section 2282 forbids the issuance, except by a…
• Fed. Power Comm'n v. Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1960)
  …s for reservoir purposes.” 105 U. S. App. D. C., at 152, 265 F. 2d, at 344. Because of conflict between the views of the court below and those of the Second Circuit, and of the general importance of the questions involved, we granted certio-rari. 360 U. S. 915. The parties have urged upon us a number of contentions, but we think these cases turn upon the answers to two questions, namely, (1) whether the Tuscarora lands covered by the Commission’s license are part of a “reservation” as defined and used in…
• Fla. Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Jacobsen, 362 U.S. 73 (U.S. 1960)
  …] left with no course other than to dismiss the action,” which it did. 169 F. Supp. 774, 776. Appellants brought the case here on direct appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, and we postponed the question of our jurisdiction to the hearing on the merits. 360 U. S. 915. The first and principal question presented is whether this action is one required by § 2281 to be heard by a District Court of three judges and, hence, whether we have jurisdiction of this direct appeal under § 1253. Section 2281 provides3 that a…