CONWAY

v.

DICKSON, WARDEN; BRINSON V. WILKINSON, WARDEN; ODELL V. BURKE, WARDEN; UNITED STATES EX REL. CUOMO V. FAY, WARDEN; GILSON V. KEENAN, WARDEN, ET AL.; AND TRIANTAFILLOS V. CLEMMER ET AL

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Raines, 362 U.S. 17 (U.S. 1960)
  …scope permissible under the Fifteenth Amendment, it was to be considered unconstitutional in all its applications. The Government appealed directly to this Court and we postponed the question of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits. 360 U. S. 926. Under the terms of 28 U. S. C. § 1252, the case is properly here on appeal since the basis of the decision below in fact was that the Act of Congress was unconstitutional, no matter what the contentions of the parties might be as to what its proper…
• Odell v. Burke, 281 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1960)
  …ncy, which was denied. Petitioner then, on May 28, 1959, filed in the United States Supreme Court an instrument which he designated as a motion for leave to docket and prosecute a petition for habeas corpus. That petition was denied. Odell v. Burke, 360 U.S. 926, 79 S.Ct. 1465, 3 L.Ed.2d 1541. Respondent contends that petitioner failed to prosecute a petition for certio-rari to review the state court’s decision denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus, and that he has, by his failure so to do, failed…

  ← 1 / 2 →