ARNOLD
v.
BEN KANOWSKY, INC.

U.S. | 1959-06-29
No. 888
360 U.S. 927 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Md. & Va. Milk Producers Ass'n, Inc. v. United States, 362 U.S. 458 (U.S. 1960)
    …charge that the Government appealed directly to this Court under the Expediting Act.6 The Association similarly appealed to review the judgments against it on the Sherman Act § 3 charge and the Clayton Act § 7 charge. We noted probable jurisdiction, 360 U. S. 927, and treat both appeals in this opinion. The Association's chief argument for antitrust exemption is based on § 2 of the Capper-Yolstead Act, which authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to issue a cease- and-desist order upon a finding that a coo…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw