GALLEGOS ET AL.

v.

HOY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• Ogden v. United States, 303 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1962)
  …2 S.Ct. 240, 7 L.Ed.2d 134; United States v. Klinghoffer Bros. Realty Corp., 285 F. 2d 487, 493 (2d Cir. 1960); United States v. Simmons, 281 F. 2d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 1959); Johnston v. United States, 260 F. 2d 345, 347 (10th Cir. 1958), cert. denied 360 U.S. 935, 80 S.Ct. 1454, 4 L.Ed.2d 1547; United States v. Tellier, 255 F. 2d 441, 449 (2d Cir. 1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 821, 79 S.Ct. 33, 3 L.Ed.2d 62. Compare Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 279,…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• McCROSSEN v. United States, 339 F.2d 810 (10th Cir. 1965)
  …courtroom when not testifying. The request to exclude witnesses was made by appellant’s counsel at the beginning of the trial and after the jury had been empaneled and sworn.5 In Johnston v. United States, 10 Cir., 260 F. 2d 345, 347, cert, denied, 360 U.S. 935, 80 S.Ct. 1454, 4 L.Ed.2d 1547, Judge Pickett, speaking for this court, stated the applicable rule of law in the following language: “ * * * The question of whether witnesses should be excluded from the court room while not testifying is addressed t…