BARNES

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Charles Mathis v. Rundle, 394 F.2d 748 (3d Cir. 1968)
  …he court held that even six hours between appointment and trial might not evidence inadequate assistance of counsel such as to deprive defendant of his constitutional right, Baldwin v. United States, 260 F. 2d 117, 118 (4th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 938, 79 S.Ct. 1463, 3 L.Ed.2d 1550 (1959); accord, United States v. Ray, supra. Beginning in 1962, however, the Fourth Circuit moved toward the evolution of the new, more liberal rule which the crowded status of state criminal dockets and widespread pr…
• United States & Preston Smith v. Marchese, 341 F.2d 782 (9th Cir. 1965)
  …ffirmed by this court per curiam on April 15, 1959, 264 F. 2d 892. (3) Petitions for certiorari were denied by the United States Supreme Court —Marchese v. United States, 360 U.S. 930, 79 S.Ct. 1447, 3 L.Ed.2d 543 (1959); Del Bono v. United States, 360 U.S. 938, 79 S.Ct. 1463, 3 L.Ed.2d 1550 (1959). (4) Marchese and then Del Bono filed motions to annul, vacate and set aside their judgments of conviction under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Marchese, Clk’s Tr. p. 98; Del Bono, Clk’s Tr. p. 24). Both w…
• United States ex rel. Donald Tillery v. Cavell, 294 F.2d 12 (3d Cir. 1961)
  …nt that an accused be given the assistance of counsel. The Constitution’s guarantee of assistance of counsel cannot be satisfied by mere formal appointment.” And in Baldwin v. United States, 4 Cir., 1958, 260 F. 2d 117, 118, certiorari denied 1959, 360 U.S. 938, 79 S.Ct. 1463, 3 L.Ed.2d 1550, the court said: “ * * * What may be a reasonable time in one case can be quite unreasonable in another, and the sufficiency of the time depends upon what is disclosed to counsel by his client and, in this instance, i…