QUICKIE TRANSPORT CO.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Refrigerated Transp. Co., Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Comm'n & the United States, 616 F.2d 748 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …service shown by the single supporting shipper.” 82 M.C.C. at 567. See also M.I. O'Boyle & Son, Inc., Extension—Fluorspar, 88 M.C.C. 559 (1962); Quickie Transport Co. v. U. S. and Indian-Head Truck Line, Inc., 169 F.Supp. 826 (D.Minn.), aff'd mem., 361 U.S. 36, 80 S.Ct. 140, 4 L.Ed.2d 111 (1959).…
• MAY Trucking Co. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 593 F.2d 1349 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …the prospective service “is or will be required by the present or future public convenience and necessity . . . .” Interstate Commerce Act, § 207(a), 49 U.S.C. § 307(a) (1970); Quickie Transp. v. United States, 169 F.Supp. 826, 828 (D.Minn.), aff'd, 361 U.S. 36, 80 S.Ct. 140, 4 L. Ed.2d 111 (1959). . Pan American Bus Lines Operations, 1 M. C.C. 190, 203 (1936). . Youngstown Cartage Co. v. ICC, 187 U.S. App.D.C. 294, 295, 571 F. 2d 1243, 1244, cert. denied, -U.S. --, 99 S.Ct. 97, 58 L.Ed.2d 119 (1978). .…
• Ross Express, Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 529 F.2d 679 (1st Cir. 1976)
  …ailroad Co. v. United States, 315 U.S. 15, 25, 62 S.Ct. 432, 86 L.Ed. 586 (1942); Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. United States, 369 F.Supp. 1242, 1244 (W.D.Mo.1973); Quickie Transport Co. v. United States, 169 F.Supp. 826, 829 (D.Minn.), aff’d mem., 361 U.S. 36, 80 S.Ct. 140, 4 L.Ed.2d 111 (1959). The scope of our review of Commission decisions concerning certification is quite narrow, viz. “whether the action of the Commission is supported by ‘substantial evidence’ . . . Illinois Central Railroad Co. v.…