PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Props., Inc., 382 U.S. 223 (U.S. 1965)
  …n various courts of appeals. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit sustained the Commission’s action (United Gas Improvement Co. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 269 F. 2d 865) but we vacated the judgment (Public Service Comm’n v. Federal Power Comm’n, 361 U. S. 195) for reconsideration in light of Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service Comm’n (CATCO), 360 U. S. 378; and the other courts of appeals did likewise.1 The Commission thereupon instituted an area rate proceeding for south Louisiana and consolidated…
• United GAS Improvement Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 283 F.2d 817 (9th Cir. 1960)
  …list “is not exhaustive.” It is not represented in the Commission’s brief that these are the actual schedules relied upon by the Commission in its order of August 10, 1959. . Public Service Commission of New York v. Federal Power Commission et al., 361 U.S. 195, 197, 80 S.Ct. 292, 4 L.Ed. 2d 237, reversing United Gas Improvement Company v. Federal Power Commission, 3 Cir., 269 F. 2d 865, with directions to remand to the Federal Power Commission “for reconsideration and re-determination in the light of Atla…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Pub. Serv. Comm'n OF the State OF NEW York v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 287 F.2d 146 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
  …-Seaboard was reversed by the Supreme Court to permit the Federal Power Commission to determine for itself whether the standards set forth in Cateo had been satisfied. Public Service Commission of State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, 1959, 361 U.S. 195, 80 S.Ct. 292, 4 L.Ed.2d 237. In the case before us, the Commission purports to have made a determination of that sort. In our view, however, the decision of the Commission is unsupported by substantial evidence in the record, and cannot stand. The…

Authorities Cited

• Atl. Ref. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of N.Y., 360 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1959)