KING
v.
CONSOLIDATED UNDERWRITERS

U.S. | 1959-12-14
No. 273
361 U.S. 198 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ferguson v. Hosp. Corp. Int'l, Ltd., 769 F.2d 268 (5th Cir. 1985)
    …g the required premium ... or other insurance company authorized under this Act to insure the payment of compensation to injured employees. HCI contends that Consolidated Underwriters v. King, 160 Tex. 18, 325 S.W. 2d 127, 129 (Tex.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 198, 80 S.Ct. 295, 4 L.Ed.2d 238 (1959), conclusively decided this issue in its favor. We disagree with HCI’s contention that King is controlling in this case. The issue in King was whether a Louisiana employee working in Texas for a Louisiana corporat…
  • Kindle v. Cudd Pressure Control, Inc., 792 F.2d 507 (5th Cir. 1986)
    …he Texas proceedings, since “Texas courts will not entertain jurisdiction to enforce rights arising under [the Louisiana Worker’s Compensation Law].” Consolidated Underwriters v. King, 160 Tex. 18, 325 S.W. 2d 127, 128, cert. denied and app. dism’d, 361 U.S. 198, 80 S.Ct. 295, 4 L.Ed.2d 238 (1959). Landry blazes our path. We find no “unmistakable language” in the Louisiana compensation statute, or the cases interpreting it, that would require resort to the law of a sister state in this decision. Finally, C…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw