MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR,

v.

H. B. ZACHRY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists v. Street, 367 U.S. 740 (U.S. 1961)
  …repay the dues and assessments previously paid by the individual plaintiffs. The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed this judgment, 215 Ga. 27, 108 S. E. 2d 796, and on appeal to this Court, under 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (1), probable jurisdiction was noted. 361 U. S. 807. I completely defer to the guiding principle that this Court will abstain from entertaining a serious constitutional question when a statute may fairly be construed so as to avoid the issue, but am unable to accept the restrictive interpretation th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Co., 362 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1960)
  …tion of production of goods” than it was under the Act of 1938, when it substituted the words “directly essential” for the word “necessary,” and added the requirement that the employment be “closely related” to production. We brought the case here, 361 U. S. 807, because of an asserted conflict between circuits. (See Chambers Construction Co. v. Mitchell, 233 F. 2d 717, and Mitchell v. Chambers Construction Co., 214 F. 2d 515.) The court below, in applying its rule excluding “construction,” relied on our p…
• Miner v. Atlass, 363 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1960)
  …Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the Court. Certiorari was granted in this case, 361 U. S. 807, to review the decision of the Court of Appeals holding that a District Court sitting in admiralty lacked power to order the taking of oral depositions for the purpose of discovery only, and that Rule 32 of the Admiralty Rules of the District [*642]…