KARP ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Schaffer v. United States, 362 U.S. 511 (U.S. 1960)
  …iled charge, each petitioner was found guilty and thereafter fined and sentenced to prison. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, likewise finding that no prejudice existed by reason of the joint trial. 266 F. 2d 435. We granted certiorari. 361 U. S. 809. The allegations of the indictment having met the explicit provisions of Rule 8 (b) as to joinder of defendants, we cannot find clearly erroneous the findings of the trial court and the Court of Appeals that no prejudice resulted from the joint tri…
• Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1960)
  …ollowing its decision in Blaski v. Hoffman, supra, granted the writ. 261 F. 2d 467. To settle the conflict that has arisen among the circuits respecting the proper interpretation and application of § 1404 (a),8 we granted certiorari. 359 U. S. 904; 361 U. S. 809. [*340] Without sacrifice or slight of any tenable position, the parties have in this Court commendably narrowed their contentions to the. scope of the only relevant inquiry. The points of contention may be sharpened by first observing what is not i…
• Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 362 U.S. 330 (U.S. 1960)
  …y, rules, or working conditions,’ and was thus a bar-gainable issue under the Railway Labor Act, is clearly erroneous.” 3 It held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act did not apply to bar an injunction against this strike4 and [*335] we granted certiorari, 361 U. S. 809, to consider this important question.5 We hold, with the District Court, that this case involves or grows out of a labor dispute within the meaning of the Norris-LaGuardia Act and that the District Court was without jurisdiction permanently to enjo…

  ← 1 / 2 →