ELKINS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1960)
  …ion by federal officers. “Hence the unlawfulness of the State search and seizure, if indeed they were unlawful, did not entitle defendants to an order of the .District Court suppressing the property seized.” 266 F. 2d, at 594. We granted certiorari, 361 U. S. 810, to consider a question of importance in the administration of federal justice. The question is this: May articles obtained as the result of an unreasonable search and seizure by state officers, without involvement of federal officers, be introduced…
• Bhd. of Locomotive Eng'rs v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.R. Co., 363 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1960)
  …the dispute before the Adjustment Board by ordering that the railroad restore the status quo, or, in the alternative, pay the employees the amount they would have been paid had changes in working conditions giving rise to the dispute not been made.” 361 U. S. 810. See Elgin, J. & E. R. Co. v. Burley, 325 U. S. 711, 723; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Ind. R. Co., 353 U. S. 30, 33-34. We did not decide in Chicago River, and we do not decide here, whether a federal court can, during the…
• Massey Motors, Inc. v. United States, 364 U.S. 92 (U.S. 1960)
  …the depreciable property, equal the cost or other basis of the property.” The Courts of Appeals have divided on the method of depreciation which is permissible in relation to such assets, and we therefore granted certiorari to resolve this conflict. 361 U. S. 810, 812. We have concluded that the reasonable allowance for depreciation of the property in question used in the taxpayer’s business is to be calculated over the estimated useful life of the asset while actually employed by the taxpayer, applying a de…