DAVIS

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Winters v. Abe Lavine, 574 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …, 262 N.Y. 1, 4, 186 N.E. 28, 29 (1933); In re Levy, 255 N.Y. 223, 226, 174 N.E. 461, 462 (1931); see Local 824, International Longshoremen's Association, (Ind.) v. Waterfront Commission, 6 N.Y.2d 861, 188 N.Y.S.2d 562, 160 N.E. 2d 93, cert. denied, 361 U.S. 835, 80 S.Ct. 87, 4 L.Ed.2d 76 (1959); id. at 862, 160 N.E. 2d at 94, 188 N.Y.S.2d at 563 (dissenting opinion). In such circumstances the appellant has the “burden of presenting to [the Court of Appeals] a record which establishes that such construction…
• R.I. Consumers' Council & Div. of Pub. Utils. & Carriers of the State of R.I. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 504 F.2d 203 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …15 (1911) (orders “capable of repetition, yet evading review”) ; Friend v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 323, 325, 388 F. 2d 579, 581 (1967) (issue “continuing and of public importance”) ; Dyer v. SEC, 266 F. 2d 33, 46^17 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 835, 80 S.Ct. 86, 4 L.Ed.2d 75, 31 S.Ct. 279, 283, 55 L.Ed. 310 (1959). While courts have treated these matters under the single rubric of mootness, e. g., United States v. W. T. Grant Co., supra, it has been suggested that Article III requirements are…
• Ihrke v. N. States Power Co., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir. 1972)
  …the litigation a continuing character . . ., the mere fact that the particular subject matter of the instant cause has expired does not render the case moot.” In Dyer v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 266 F. 2d 33, 47 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 835, 80 S.Ct. 86, 4 L.Ed.2d 75 (1959), this Court recognized the “public interest” exception to the mootness doctrine. In that case, this Court said: “In still wider horizon, there also is a recognized right of judicial discretion, in the public intere…