BUFORD ET AL.

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Calvert, 523 F.2d 895 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …United States v. Brickey, 426 F. 2d 680, 684 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 828, 91 S.Ct. 55, 27 L.Ed.2d 57 (1970). The scope of the wire fraud statute is equally broad. See United States v. Hancock, 268 F. 2d 205, 206 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 837, 80 S.Ct. 89, 4 L.Ed.2d 77 (1959). The standard was set forth in Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8-9, 74 S.Ct. 358, 363, 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954): * * * Where one does an act with knowledge that use of the mails will follow in the ordinary course…
• Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp. (formerly Switzer Bros., 429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970)
  …ases where inflation is used to demonstrate why a trial court committed no error in refusing to order a remittitur when a damage award, compared to past cases, seems high, see e. g., Virginian Ry. Co. v. Rose, 267 F. 2d 312 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U. S. 837, 80 S.Ct. 89, 4 L.Ed.2d 77 (1959) [personal injury]. We are unable, however, to find any authority requiring, or even allowing, the increase of a damage award, once found, to offset the decreased value of the dollar. Nor can Radiant successfully con…
• Charlton v. United States & John W. Macy, Jr., 412 F.2d 390 (3d Cir. 1969)
  …sion from union membership there challenged. 407 F. 2d at 1198.) Meehan, Dabney and Pelicone were District of Columbia Circuit Court appeals. Earlier District of Columbia cases, Hofflund v. Seaton, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 171, 265 F. 2d 363, cert. denied, 361 U.S. 837, 80 S.Ct. 55, 4 L.Ed.2d 77 (1959), and Hargett v. Sommerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 243 F. 2d 29 (1957), followed the narrowest of the possible tests, the procedural regularity rule. The Court of Claims which, like the District of Columbia Circuit,…

  ← 1 / 3 →